To descend at constant speed , whatever that speed might be, the force vector should match excatly the pull vector of gravity according to standard newtonian physics. If the blast is being lowered , that would result in the object accelerating towards the landing site. If that were the case the landing should transmit a plastic transformation on the vehicle ( crashing and denting, possibly totaly breaking) , or an elastic transformation , which could be achieved with a somewhat heavy suspension system. In either casse dust should settle on the vehicle legs. Unless they were planning for some circus performance like a viral box jump from Islam Makhachev , I don’t see a point why would someone deal with all the added weight and complexity in calculations. Ballsy move nonetheless. If you meant that the vehicle lowering slowly at constat speed and not lowering the throttle, the first particles to go would be the finest ones. So no dust unless they landed on a dune. Just big rocks , potentially boulders. If the landed on a lunar dune I suppose should make an even deeper crater on the dune , with all the dust removed from the blast. Even in the case of “the moon is different” and the lack of atmosphere potentially preventing vortexes forming from the blast( I am not saying it’s definitely the case) , even then some of the dust would have hit the legs on the inner part and as a consequence preclude the spotless look of the gold foil on the legs. Even if we grant that the micro meteorites don’t hit that often, just the violent dust thrown from the vehicle would have sandblasted the uneven gold foil, which Dave correctly described as a christmas wrap. The scorching temperature of 260 F (126 C) is more than an order of magnitude lower than the burning temperature of aerozine 50 oxidized by nitrogen tetroxide which they allegedly used. That mixture burns at 5432 F or 3000 C. Pure quartz melts at less than 1800 C. Moon dust at 1100 to 1200 C , becoming pure liquid at 1400 C as per websites referenced from google’s AI. It’s good to call out mistakes so that “debunkers” don’t use tham as a strawman to mislead and fatigue those seeking the truth. In this case the mistakes were yours ,not Dave’s.

Period.

To my mind the surface of the moon would be heated to a signricant extent when exposed to sunlight and radiant heat would ensure that the shadowed parts of an astronaut or anything else close to the surface would be much warmer than during lunar night.

Through the process of tidal locking the Moon’s day length is the same as its ‘year’ – namely one month. The average daytime would thus be two Earth weeks, plenty of time for the aurface to get nice and toasty. Unlike Earth rhe Moon’s rotational axis is barely tilted and so there is little in the way of seasonal change in day length. In any case the Sea of Tranquility is only 8 degrees north of the lunar equator so seasons would not really be an issue. I don’t know whether it was possible to measure surface temperatures on the moon from Earth fifty-five years ago. If it was, a theoretical mission might have been timed for a period when the surface of the Moon was expected to be comfortable for humans, perhaps mid-morning.

Despite the above I no longer believe that man has been on the moon and this site was a big help in reaching that conclusion. God be with us all as we face down the effort to make permanent a global tyranny.

https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/12652

There was no one more qualified to pilot the ascent stage of the Eagle LM ascent module.

All you have to do to realize we never went to the moon, is watch the Apollo 11 post mission press conference…..looks like a hostage video. It’s beyond clear these three guys were under extreme duress…

Sean, the answer to your last question is yes.

Perfectly said, mellyrn.I am old enough to remember that radiation was never (maybe mentioned once or twice) but it was most definitely a topic that was avoided by in the time. Radiation would have, at the least, caused some sort of fogginess. That is really putting it mildly. The reason why no one has gone out beyond our magnetosphere (accept for the alleged Apollo thing) is the lethal radiation. Bad for humans. Bad for photos. Deadly… As Dave mentioned, this hoax has an expiration date.

What on gods green earth are you rambling on about Sean? Where in the article did he say that the mars rover and drones are fake? What does “props can`t be used in no atmosphere” have to do with anything, and where in the article did you read this little nugget.

THIS is what you got from reading the whole article? Really!? Did you even read it. Can you read? What are you smoking, and who is posting stupid claims? So many questions, so little brainpower…and the irony of you calling someone thick…is just too much.